Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5071b/5071b42c57f698f39db3f61907568ab406ec18b7" alt="shin1068111's picture shin1068111's picture"
Post for 03/04: Panel discussion
On the first day of the panel discussion with historical characters, it was noticeable that most of the figures are women and they come from 19 to 21st century. It is understandable that people have more knowledge about the recent figures that they chose to be them. Even though, all the students were advised to select a figure that could represent gender, science, and technology, I feel like most of them decided to represent a figure that is more focused on gender. The figures represented by some of the students are the ones who have tried intentionally or unintentionally break the gender binary and the stereotypes of women.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5071b/5071b42c57f698f39db3f61907568ab406ec18b7" alt="cara's picture cara's picture"
March 3: Class Notes on Second Panel.
Here's a rough transcript of the Panel of fictional characters we had in class on Wednesday.
First, we went through forum postings from the previous week:
merlin: Imagining yourself doing activities actually changes the brain. For instance playing the piano. People who imagined themselves playing, but didn't actually know how, their brains appeared the same as those who were actually being instructed.
watson/vgaffney: Close reading is still a very important skills in the humanities. Particularly english and philosophy. The complexity of the writing requires it.