After our consideration of "evolutionary education" in class today, I feel compelled to comment on how static standardization causes education to be. Beginning around second grade, kids are farmed to perform on standardized tests. Sometimes teachers' pay and school funding are intricately tied to how students score on the tests, creating tremendous classroom pressure on teachers to "teach to the test." The 2002 No Child Left Behind Act attempted to "improve" educational standards across the United States by declaring schools as educationally "fit" if their students met a certain tested benchmark.

I completely understand why Darwin keeps saying he doesn't have the space to list all the pertinent examples. The ones he does list are quite enough-- I agree with whoever said that they never want to read about pigeons again, because I never want to read the words "short-beaked tumbler" ever again.

I guess the idea or rather questions that that have been consistently present in my thoughts after this weeks readings are about human evolution. The idea/questions derive specifically from the fifth chapter, when Darwin states that variations occur due to environmental factors. So in the age of globalization and never ending changes in modernization (technologically, medically, etc.) how is human evolution affected? Humans are constantly moving from one place to another, encountering different geographical locations and facing different technological advances; are these changes allowing for the human body to adapt? Is this constant movement allowing the human species to evolve according to the environmental factors that affect it, or is it limiting the species' ability to evolve?

Notes for DAY 4: GIST 1/31/11 Class Summary

On week when posting class notes, we don’t have to post additionally.

Also when mentioning peer comments in our posts, Include usernames.

Activity:

As I am extremely interested in science education, I enjoyed our section’s discussion on education. While many of us noted our intention of gaining knowledge, none of us expressed the revision of our existing knowledge as an expectation of college. I must admit, as a premed student, I have been trained to take certain courses for the purpose of acquiring the information necessary for passing the Medical College Admissions Test. Although I did not anticipate revising my store of knowledge as I progressed through college, that does not mean that it hasn’t happened. In assessing my own education, the majority of instances where I was successfully challenged to reevaluate and modify my own understanding occurred in the discussion-based classes I have taken.

In part I am still stuck on our conversations from the first week of class involving the inability of science to find the truth.  In our discussion on the scientific method we were told that there is no way of finding the truth using science, but we are able to disprove things.  I would have to agree that when running a chemistry experiment I feel more confident in saying that my product is not something, than confirming its identity.   When I run an IR and find something uncharacteristic of my expected product I can firmly state this is not what I was expe

From the readings and the video of Stelarc we saw, thoughts would not stop coming to my mind. Thoughts about how mind-blowing the world we live in is. I kept wondering, is technology really something that's benefiting us, humans? We've created it, we are its creators and we supplied it with power in the intention of aiding ourselves and making life easier, but now the question that's been posted and that's been popping to my head after the reading from Haraway is that, is the machine we have created become a part of us? Is it really helping making our lives better and easier? Or are our machines going to take over our world and our lives? The thought of "no separation" is very new, very foreign, and very scary.