Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!

someshine's picture

2011 Artists Spotlight from Advocate

Diva 4, Kurt Kauper

Diva 4, Kurt Kauper

 

Check out Advocate editors favorite art pieces from 2011 here.

 This painting by Aaron Smith is my favorite! What's yours? Maybe one way this class site can continue is each of us keeping an eye out for our favorite art piece entangled with gender and sexuality during 2012? Post here!

Rip-staver, Aaron Smith

Rip-staver, Andrew Smith 

------

 

Wishing you a rejuvenating, relaxing, refreshing start to 2012. 

Critical Feminist Studies 2012 - Web Paper # 4

Welcome to Critical Feminist Studies, a course offered at Bryn Mawr College in Spring 2012. Here you will find the final web events all of the the students pursued individually as they completed their course work.

Take a look around, and feel warmly welcome to respond in the comment area available at the end of each paper. What strikes, intrigues, puzzles you...what, among your reactions, might be of interest or use to the writer, or others in the class, or others who--exploring the internet--might be in search of a thoughtful conversation about the shape and sound of feminism today?

 

Critical Feminist Studies 2012 - Web Paper # 3

Welcome to Critical Feminist Studies, a course offered at Bryn Mawr College in Spring 2012. Three months into the semester, students are exploring questions that have arisen for them in the course of our discussions of Eugenides' novel Middlesex, Bornstein's Gender Workbook, Kristof and WuDunn's Half the Sky, Query and Funari's Live Nude Girls Unite!, hooks' Feminism is for Everybody, Bannon's The Undefeated, Kimmel's "Masculinity as Homophobia," and Ware's Jimmy Corrigan.

Take a look around, and feel warmly welcome to respond in the comment area available at the end of each paper. What strikes, intrigues, puzzles you...what, among your reactions, might be of interest or use to the writer, or others in the class, or others who--exploring the internet--might be in search of a thoughtful conversation about the shape and sound of feminism today?

 

Critical Feminist Studies 2012 - Web Papers #1

These are the first webpapers to emerge from Critical Feminist Studies, a course offered at Bryn Mawr College in Spring 2012. One month into the semester, students are writing here about ...

Take a look around, and feel warmly welcome to respond in the comment area available at the end of each paper. What strikes, intrigues, puzzles you...what, among your reactions, might be of interest or use to the writer, or others in the class, or others who--exploring the internet--might be in search of a thoughtful conversation about the shape and sound of feminism today?

 

Critical Feminist Studies: An Introduction

Critical Feminist Studies: An Introduction
English 193 Bryn Mawr College
Anne Dalke
Fall 2012, TTh 12:45-2:15
English House Lecture Hall

Generous Feminism,
by Gail Chavenelle, BMC '67
Anne Dalke's picture

Literary Kinds, Emerging Genres...

Shlomo's picture

Self Evaluation

While I have been, I think, pretty vocal about what I like and dislike about this class, I have decided to keep my evaluation private.  The reasons for this are varied and complex, and I won't bore you with the details.  In any case, I will be emailing my evaluation to Anne and Kaye.  It's been a pleasure.

Shlomo's picture

My Final Diffraction

This diffraction is not easy for me to write.  I think that’s because this class has left me feeling largely confused.  When we began the class, I saw myself as someone who loved Gender and Sexuality Studies—not so much the theories behind them as the case studies I read about and saw all around me (as a Biology major, I’ve noticed that I tend to reject the idea that one theory can explain all of gender or all of society—I think this is because in anthropological sense, there is no theory that computes to a scientific law.  This is, for me, a weakness and a strength).  The first reading by Barad caused me some distress, because I couldn’t understand why we were working so hard to connect physics and gender.  In my mind, physics and gender both connect to everything else (indeed, if you get philosophical enough, everything connects to everything else), but that doesn’t mean we should spend our time dissecting the connection.

            After Barad, I was further confused by the focus the course took on disability.  I think disability is an important topic, and one that merits discussion, but I didn’t feel like our discussions ever had anything to do with gender.  Once again, the sheer interdisciplinary-ness of the course had me feeling lost.

Syndicate content